Retirement Evaluation Team
- Retirement Evaluation Team
- the team that evaluates the deliverable
retirement work products
and the process that was used to produce them
As illustrated in the preceding figure, Retirement Evaluation Team is part of the following inheritance hierarchy:
- Type: Concrete
- Superclass: Evaluation Team
- Subclasses:
The typical team-specific responsibilities of a Retirement Evaluation Team are to:
- Evaluate the deliverable retirement work products.
- Notify the retirement team of any defects found.
- Recommend improvements to the process regarding:
- The retirement activities and tasks.
- The standards, templates, and evaluation checklists for
the deliverable retirement work products.
The retirement evaluation team typically inherits the
common team responsibilities from the
team process component.
The retirement evaluation team typically consists of persons
playing one or more of the following roles:
-
Technical Leader,
who facilitates the evaluation meeting and evaluates the
retirement work products for technical quality.
-
Reuse Engineer,
who evaluates the deliverable retirement work products
for reusability.
-
Process Engineer,
who evaluates the retirement work products for
conformance to the associated standards and evaluation
checklists.
-
Quality Engineer,
who evaluates the retirement work products for quality
and conformance to the relevant conventions.
-
Technical Writer,
who acts as scribe at the evaluation meeting,
summarizes the evaluation team’s findings in the
evaluation summary report, and delivers the report to the
retirement team.
The retirement evaluation team typically performs the
following
team-specific tasks in an iterative,
incremental, parallel, and time-boxed manner:
The retirement evaluation team typically inherits the
common team tasks from the
team process component.
The retirement evaluation team typically produces the
following
quality engineering work products:
Guidelines
- Evaluations should not devolve into walkthroughs because
the work products being evaluateed should be able to stand on
their own without the need for the authors to walk the
evaluators through them.
- To the extent practical, the developers of a work product
should:
- Informally evaluate it prior to the formal evaluation to
ensure that the actual evaluators do not waste their
evaluateing an inadequately prepared work product.
- Not be the only evaluators of it because it is
difficult for developers to take the proper
“destructive” attitude during the evaluation
that will maximize the number of defects found.
- A retirement evaluation team typically inherits the
common team guidelines from the
team process component.