Management Evaluation Team
- Management Evaluation Team
- the team that
inspects the deliverable
management work products
that are produced by the management teams
As illustrated in the preceding figure, Management Evaluation Team is part of the following inheritance hierarchy:
- Type: Concrete
- Superclass: Evaluation Team
- Subclasses:
The typical team-specific responsibilities of a Management Evaluation Team are to:
- Inspect the deliverable management work products.
- Notify the management team(s) of any defects found.
- Recommend improvements to the process regarding:
- The management activities and tasks.
- The standards, templates, and evaluation checklists for
the deliverable management work products.
The management evaluation team typically inherits the
common team responsibilities from the
team method component.
The management evaluation team typically consists of persons
playing one or more of the following roles:
-
Technical Leader,
who facilitates the evaluation meeting and inspects the
management work products for technical quality.
-
System Architect,
who evaluates the deliverable management work products
for system feasibility.
-
Test Engineer,
who inspects the requirements work products for
testability.
-
Process Engineer,
who inspects the management work products for
conformance to the associated standards and evaluation
checklists.
-
Quality Engineer,
who inspects the management work products for quality
and conformance to the relevant conventions.
-
Technical Writer,
who acts as scribe at the evaluation meeting,
summarizes the evaluation team’s findings in the
evaluation summary report, and delivers the report to the
management team(s).
The management evaluation team typically performs the
following
team-specific
project management tasks in an iterative, incremental,
parallel, and time-boxed manner:
The management evaluation team typically inherits the
common team tasks from the
team method component.
The management evaluation team typically produces the following
quality engineering work products:
- Evaluations should not devolve into walkthroughs because
the work products being inspected should be able to stand on
their own without the need for the authors to walk the
inspectors through them.
- To the extent practical, the developers of a work product
should:
- Informally inspect it prior to the formal evaluation to
ensure that the actual inspectors do not waste their
inspecting an inadequately prepared work product.
- Not be the only inspectors of it because it is
difficult for developers to take the proper
“destructive” attitude during the evaluation
that will maximize the number of defects found.
- The management evaluation team typically inherits the
common
guidelines from the
team process component.